#Jondo anonymous proxy windows#

Use a comon screen resolution, make sure your not having a language combo on the browser that is making you very much more unique (even en-US, de-DE at same time put your already in a group as small as only 10% of the users), Statistics are your friend: Don't try to hide too much, rather try to be as average as possible. If you have secondary Adapters: Disable their DNS (Windows Multihomed Smart DNS does paralellel DNS requests to ALL DNSSERVERS being set on the system) Use commonly used DNS servers if not on a proxy.

#Jondo anonymous proxy windows#

If avail: Enable DNS-over-HTTPs on your browser (effectively stopping Windows Multihomed SmartDNS when using a proxy) Disable third party cookies, automatic cookie clearing on close. (absolute crap, fails every sanity check, macking it so obvious) Do not noise values like device names (Ive seen things like 'Google Shader' from WebGL being changed to 1 / 4 etc. Keep the noise persistent across a browser session (changing every request is absolutely more negatively affecting) Apply noising the hashed very clearly identifying values (Canvas Hash, WebGL Hash) to optimize things, to make statistical analysis and yes,fraud detection.Р”Р‡or the moment I can recommend the following methology (from personal usage success): But never trying to link it to a specific person, not even to an ip - for me it's analysis - what does my audience use as device, metrics etc. I have to say, I use fingerprinting myself. Tracking, unless during a payment process or something for the purpose of protection (both, you as possible victim of identify credit card theft) and the business, should be treated like it once was: With us having the choice again, the choice to say yes or no. but even those have anounced to work actively against mechanisms like Fingerprinting.

PS: Also Google, who is somehow in between the chairs - on one side the heavier laws - on the other side the advertisement clients with their demands for more analytics, insights etc. A data set of just a few bits is enough to uniquely identify you, fingerprints are a very very accurate tool for that purpose - and the more you hide such tracking values, the more unique you'll become, as the 0815 user doesn't really care, Even worse: If you alter values and keep em static (principally a great idea), but this value combination is like 1 of 100, it's enough depending on your behaviour to uniquely identify you across the whole internet. And no, Firefox cannot guarantee your anonimity, no browser can fully assure that. But prepare for 35GB of data to build it and quite a long build process. Chromium you can build yourself (or get an indepdent build) with the things that you fear not in place. Chromium and Chrome are two totally different stories. While it's still possible to protect against fingerprinting, the behaviour stuff is another story - but thankfully, mostly it's being used against bots (as bot behaviour is a lot easier to identify than a very specific human being - but thats just a matter of time.Р”В«tw: I use Chromium for many data gathering processes, bypassing many mechanisms.

IP- & Cookiebased tracking mechanisms are outdated, fingerprinting on all levels taken over and the next step is already being applied on wider scale: Machine/Deep learning based behaviour analytics. Well, we're in the middle of a huge transition.